Fill out Form CMS-2567, Statement of Deficiencies with Instafill.ai
Form CMS-2567, Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction, is used to report deficiencies identified during health facility surveys. It is crucial for facilities to address these deficiencies to ensure compliance with health regulations and maintain their operational status.
#1 AI PDF Filling Software of 2024
3 out of 4 customers say they prepare their CMS-2567 forms in 37 seconds or less
Secure platform for your PDF forms and personal information
Form CMS-2567, Statement of Deficiencies free printable template
Instafill Demo: filling out a legal form in 27 seconds
How to Fill Out CMS-2567 Online for Free in 2024
Are you looking to fill out a CMS-2567 form online quickly and accurately? Instafill.ai offers the #1 AI-powered PDF filling software of 2024, allowing you to complete your CMS-2567 form in just 37 seconds or less.
Follow these steps to fill out your CMS-2567 form online using Instafill.ai:
- 1 Visit instafill.ai site and select CMS-2567.
- 2 Enter facility identification details.
- 3 List deficiencies and corrective actions.
- 4 Sign and date the form electronically.
- 5 Check for accuracy and submit form.
Our AI-powered system ensures each field is filled out correctly, reducing errors and saving you time.
Why Choose Instafill.ai for Your Fillable CMS-2567 Form?
Speed
Complete your CMS-2567 in as little as 37 seconds.
Up-to-Date
Always use the latest 2024 CMS-2567 form version.
Cost-effective
No need to hire expensive lawyers.
Accuracy
Our AI performs 10 compliance checks to ensure your form is error-free.
Security
Your personal information is protected with bank-level encryption.
Frequently Asked Questions About Form CMS-2567
The Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction (CMS-2567) form is used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to identify deficiencies in healthcare facilities and outline the corrective actions to be taken. This form is required to be submitted after an on-site survey or inspection, where deficiencies have been identified that must be corrected before the facility can continue to participate in Medicare or Medicaid programs.
The Name and Address of Facility section should include the name of the healthcare facility, its mailing address, and the contact information for the person responsible for submitting the form. This information is essential for CMS to properly identify and communicate with the facility regarding any deficiencies and the required corrective actions.
The Prefix Identification Tag is a unique identifier assigned to each deficiency identified during the survey or inspection. This tag is used to cross-reference the deficiencies listed in the Summary Statement of Deficiencies and the Plan of Correction sections. Properly using the prefix identification tags ensures that all deficiencies are addressed and corrected in the correct order.
Each deficiency should be identified clearly and specifically in the Summary Statement of Deficiencies section. This includes providing a brief description of the deficiency, the applicable regulations or standards that have been violated, and the date the deficiency was identified. Properly documenting each deficiency ensures that all parties involved have a clear understanding of the issues that need to be addressed.
The Plan of Correction section should outline the specific actions the facility will take to address each deficiency identified in the Summary Statement of Deficiencies section. This may include implementing new policies or procedures, providing additional staff training, or making physical improvements to the facility. The plan should also include a timeline for completing each corrective action and the person responsible for ensuring that it is completed.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) may grant waivers for certain deficiencies identified during inspections of hospitals. These waivers are granted based on the severity of the deficiency and its impact on patient care and safety. Hospitals may request a waiver by submitting a Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction (CMS-2567) form. The CMS will review the request and make a determination based on the information provided. It is important to note that not all deficiencies will result in a waiver, and the hospital will be required to correct any identified deficiencies that do not qualify for a waiver.
The asterisk (*) in the form indicates that a deficiency has been identified that may be eligible for a waiver. The hospital must address all deficiencies, whether waivable or not, in the Plan of Correction section of the form. If a waiver is granted, the hospital will still be required to implement a corrective action plan to address the deficiency, but the waiver may allow for a longer timeframe to complete the correction.
The Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction (CMS-2567) form should be signed and dated by the hospital's Administrator or designee. The form should be returned to the CMS as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days from the date of the inspection report. If additional time is needed to complete the correction, the hospital may request an extension by submitting a request in writing to the CMS.
The estimated time required to complete the information collection for the CMS-2567 form varies depending on the number and complexity of the deficiencies identified. The form instructions provide an estimated timeframe for completing each section of the form. However, if there are comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate or suggestions for improving the form, the hospital should submit these comments to the CMS for consideration.
If there are comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate or suggestions for improving the CMS-2567 form, the hospital should submit these comments in writing to the CMS. The CMS will review the comments and make any necessary revisions to the form instructions or timeframes. The hospital should continue to work on completing the form as accurately and thoroughly as possible, while also communicating with the CMS if any additional information or clarification is needed.
The following should not be sent to the PRA Reports Clearance Office: completed CMS-2567 forms without accompanying deficiencies or corrections. These forms will be returned to the sender.
Questions or concerns regarding the submission of documents should be directed to the CMS National Training Center at 1-800-638-6922 or by email at [email protected].
The valid OMB control number for the CMS-2567 information collection is 0920-0634.
The expiration date of the OMB approval for the CMS-2567 form is December 31, 2023.
A deficiency is a failure to meet a requirement of the Conditions of Participation (CoPs) or other federal regulations. A recommended waiver is a request for an exception to a specific CoP or regulation due to unusual or extenuating circumstances. The CMS-2567 form is used to report both deficiencies and recommended waivers.
If a facility fails to provide a plan of correction for cited deficiencies, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) may take enforcement action. This could include denial of payment for new admissions, termination of the provider agreement, or imposition of a civil money penalty. It is important for facilities to address deficiencies in a timely manner to avoid these consequences.
For nursing homes, CMS is required to make findings available to the public within 60 days of completion of a survey. Plans of correction must be submitted within 30 days of the survey and must be implemented within a reasonable timeframe. For other types of facilities, the timeline may vary, so it is important to refer to the specific regulations or guidance from CMS.
The CMS Regional Office plays a role in the waiver process for facilities seeking relief from certain Medicare Conditions of Participation. The Regional Office reviews and makes recommendations on waiver requests, which are then forwarded to the National Level for a final decision. The Regional Office may also provide guidance and support to facilities during the waiver application process.
The Instructions section of the CMS-2567 form provides guidance on how to complete the form accurately and completely. It includes information on what information is required, how to format the information, and any special instructions or considerations. It is important to read and follow the instructions carefully to ensure that the form is submitted correctly and that any deficiencies or plans of correction are addressed effectively.
Compliance CMS-2567
Validation Checks by Instafill.ai
1
Ensures that the Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number is correctly entered in Section (X1).
The system ensures that the Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number is accurately captured in Section (X1) of the form. It checks for the correct format and length of the identification number, as per the regulatory requirements. If the number does not meet the expected criteria, the system flags it for review. This validation is crucial for the proper identification and processing of the form.
2
Confirms that the building and wing identifiers in Section (X1) are specified if applicable.
The system confirms the presence of building and wing identifiers in Section (X1), provided they are applicable to the facility being surveyed. It ensures that these fields are not left blank when required, and that the identifiers match the facility's official records. This step is important for accurate location identification within larger complexes or campuses.
3
Verifies that the Date Survey Completed in Section (X2) is provided and formatted correctly (MM/DD/YYYY).
The system verifies that the Date Survey Completed field in Section (X2) is not only filled out but also adheres to the correct date format of MM/DD/YYYY. It checks for common errors such as missing digits, incorrect month or day entries, and non-existent dates. This ensures that the date of survey completion is unambiguous and standardized across all forms.
4
Checks that the Name of Facility Surveyed in Section (X3) matches the full legal name of the facility.
The system checks that the Name of Facility Surveyed in Section (X3) is the full legal name of the facility as registered. It cross-references the entered name with official databases to ensure accuracy and consistency. This validation is essential for the legal and formal recognition of the facility in question.
5
Validates that the Facility Address in Section (X3) is complete, including street, city, state, and zip code.
The system validates that the Facility Address provided in Section (X3) is complete and includes all necessary components such as street, city, state, and zip code. It checks for the presence of each part of the address and may also verify the correctness of the zip code in relation to the city and state. This comprehensive check ensures that the facility's location is accurately documented for any necessary correspondence or follow-up actions.
6
Confirms the inclusion of the Name of Accrediting Organization Performing Survey in Section (X3) if applicable.
The AI ensures that the Name of the Accrediting Organization Performing Survey is included in Section (X3) when it is applicable. It checks for the presence of this information and prompts the user to provide it if it is missing. The AI understands the importance of this data for the form's integrity and compliance with regulatory requirements. It also verifies that the name provided matches the list of known accrediting organizations to prevent errors or inconsistencies.
7
Ensures that each deficiency in Section (X4) is listed with full regulatory or Life Safety Code (LSC) identifying information.
The AI meticulously ensures that each deficiency noted in Section (X4) includes the full regulatory or Life Safety Code (LSC) identifying information. It checks for completeness and accuracy of the information, ensuring that all required details are present. The AI cross-references the cited deficiencies with the relevant regulatory or LSC documentation to confirm that the identifying information is correct and up-to-date. This validation is crucial for the proper identification and resolution of deficiencies.
8
Verifies that the ID Prefix Tag for each cited deficiency in Section (X4) is correctly entered.
The AI verifies the accuracy of the ID Prefix Tag for each deficiency cited in Section (X4). It ensures that the prefix tags are entered correctly and correspond to the specific deficiency listed. The AI checks against a predefined set of valid ID Prefix Tags to prevent any discrepancies. This step is essential for the organization and tracking of deficiencies within the system.
9
Checks that the Plan of Correction in Section (X5) is detailed and cross-referenced to the appropriate deficiency.
The AI checks that the Plan of Correction provided in Section (X5) is detailed and appropriately cross-referenced to the corresponding deficiency listed in Section (X4). It ensures that each corrective action is clearly described and linked to the specific deficiency it addresses. The AI also reviews the plan for feasibility and comprehensiveness, ensuring that it meets the necessary standards for a successful correction.
10
Validates that the Completion Date for each corrective action in Section (X5) is indicated and plausible.
The AI validates that a Completion Date for each corrective action is indicated in Section (X5) and that the dates provided are plausible. It checks for the presence of a date, its format consistency, and its reasonableness based on the scope of the corrective action. The AI also ensures that the dates are within a realistic timeframe, considering the necessary steps to rectify the deficiency.
11
Ensures that the Laboratory Director’s or Provider/Supplier Representative’s Signature is present in Section (X6).
The AI ensures that Section (X6) of the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form contains the signature of the Laboratory Director or Provider/Supplier Representative. It checks for the presence of a handwritten or electronic signature to confirm that the form has been duly authorized. The absence of a signature would flag the form as incomplete, prompting the user to provide the necessary sign-off. This validation is crucial as it attests to the authenticity and acknowledgment of the content by the responsible party.
12
Confirms that the Title of the individual signing the form is provided in Section (X6).
The AI confirms that the title of the individual who signs the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form is clearly indicated in Section (X6). It validates that the title corresponds to an authorized position, such as Laboratory Director or Provider/Supplier Representative, and is not left blank. This check is important to establish the authority of the signatory and to ensure that the form is being completed by someone with the appropriate level of responsibility.
13
Verifies that the Date the form was signed is entered in Section (X6) and is formatted correctly (MM/DD/YYYY).
The AI verifies that the date on which the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form was signed is recorded in Section (X6). It checks that the date is not only present but also follows the correct format of MM/DD/YYYY. This validation ensures consistency and accuracy in record-keeping, which is essential for tracking the timeline of the form's completion and submission. An incorrectly formatted date may lead to confusion or administrative issues.
14
Checks for the presence of an asterisk (*) on deficiency statements that may be excused from correction.
The AI checks for the presence of an asterisk (*) next to deficiency statements within the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form. This symbol indicates which deficiencies, if any, may be excused from correction. The AI's validation process includes ensuring that the asterisk is used appropriately and only where permitted. This check helps maintain the integrity of the form by adhering to the guidelines for marking deficiencies.
15
Ensures that the form is returned to the appropriate surveying agency within 10 days of receipt and that a copy is maintained for records.
The AI ensures compliance with the requirement that the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form is returned to the surveying agency within 10 days of receipt. It may include a reminder or a timestamp feature to assist the user in meeting this deadline. Additionally, the AI checks that a copy of the completed form is retained for the user's records, as stipulated by the guidelines. This validation is key to ensuring timely responses and proper documentation for future reference.
Common Mistakes in Completing CMS-2567
The Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form requires the accurate submission of the Provider, Supplier, or CLIA Identification Number. Incorrect entries may lead to processing delays or even rejection of the form. To avoid this mistake, ensure that the identification number is entered exactly as it appears on the official documentation. Double-check the number for typos, transpositions, or missing digits before submitting the form.
Section (X1) of the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form may require the submission of Building and Wing numbers or identifiers. Neglecting to provide this information may result in processing delays or even rejection of the form. To prevent this mistake, carefully review the instructions in Section (X1) and provide the required Building and Wing numbers or identifiers if applicable.
The Date Survey Completed field on the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form must be filled out accurately and completely. Incorrect or incomplete dates may lead to processing delays or even rejection of the form. To avoid this mistake, double-check the date entered against the actual date of the survey and ensure that the month, day, and year are all provided.
The Name of Facility Surveyed field on the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form must be filled out accurately and completely. Incorrect or incomplete names may lead to processing delays or even rejection of the form. To prevent this mistake, ensure that the name of the facility is entered exactly as it appears in official records.
The Facility Address field on the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form must be filled out completely, including the city, state, and zip code. Incomplete addresses may lead to processing delays or even rejection of the form. To prevent this mistake, double-check the address entered against official records and ensure that all required information is provided.
Failure to include the name of the accrediting organization that performed the survey in Section (X3) of the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form can lead to confusion and potential miscommunication between involved parties. To avoid this mistake, ensure that the name of the accrediting organization is accurately and completely filled out in the designated section. This information is crucial for proper documentation and follow-up on corrective actions.
Neglecting to include the specific regulatory or Life Safety Code (LSC) reference for each listed deficiency in Section (X4) can hinder the effectiveness of the correction process. Providing the full regulatory or LSC citation will ensure that all parties involved have a clear understanding of the applicable codes and standards that have been violated. To prevent this mistake, carefully review the codes and regulations that apply to each deficiency and include the complete citation in the corresponding section of the form.
Misaligning corrective actions with their corresponding deficiencies in Section (X5) can lead to ineffective or incorrect corrections being implemented. To avoid this mistake, ensure that each corrective action is clearly and accurately linked to the specific deficiency it addresses. This will help ensure that all corrective actions are targeted towards the root cause of the identified issues and that the facility remains in compliance with applicable codes and regulations.
Incorrect or incomplete completion dates for corrective actions in Section (X5) can create confusion and potential delays in the correction process. To prevent this mistake, ensure that the completion date for each corrective action is accurately and completely filled out, including the month, day, and year. This information is essential for tracking the progress of corrective actions and ensuring that all necessary steps are taken in a timely manner to maintain compliance with applicable codes and regulations.
Failure to include the required title and date in Section (X6) of the Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form can result in the document being considered invalid or incomplete. To avoid this mistake, ensure that the title and date are accurately and completely filled out in the designated section before submitting the form. This information is crucial for proper documentation and accountability in the correction process.
The Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form must be submitted to the appropriate agency or organization within 10 days of receiving the deficiency notice. Failing to meet this deadline can result in delays in resolving identified issues and may negatively impact your organization's standing with regulatory bodies. To avoid this mistake, ensure that you are aware of the deadline and prioritize submitting the form in a timely manner.
It is essential to return the completed Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction form to the correct agency or organization. Sending it to the wrong address or failing to send it at all can result in delays and potential penalties. To prevent this mistake, double-check the address and contact information provided on the form and ensure that it is complete and accurate before submitting.
Attempting to excuse deficiencies without proper justification or acceptance by the CMS Regional Office can result in continued non-compliance and potential penalties. It is crucial to provide clear and compelling evidence to support any proposed exceptions. To avoid this mistake, carefully review the deficiencies identified and gather all necessary documentation to support your position before submitting the form.
Failing to disclose findings within the required timeframe can result in increased scrutiny and potential penalties. It is essential to be transparent and proactive in reporting any issues that may impact your organization's compliance status. To prevent this mistake, establish a system for tracking and reporting findings in a timely manner.
Failing to have an approved plan of correction in place can result in denial of continued program participation or other penalties. It is crucial to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of correction that addresses all identified deficiencies and demonstrates a commitment to ongoing compliance. To avoid this mistake, work closely with regulatory agencies and organizations to develop a plan of correction that meets their requirements and effectively addresses any issues.
Saved over 80 hours a year
“I was never sure if my IRS forms like W-9 were filled correctly. Now, I can complete the forms accurately without any external help.”
Kevin Martin Green
Your data stays secure with advanced protection from Instafill and our subprocessors
Robust compliance program
Transparent business model
You’re not the product. You always know where your data is and what it is processed for.
ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR
Our subprocesses adhere to multiple compliance standards, including but not limited to ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Security & privacy by design
We consider security and privacy from the initial design phase of any new service or functionality. It’s not an afterthought, it’s built-in.
Fill out CMS-2567 with Instafill.ai
Worried about filling PDFs wrong? Instafill securely fills cms-2567 forms, ensuring each field is accurate.