Yes! You can use AI to fill out Uniform Arbitration Statement of Facts - Appendix XXII-A

Users often forget or mistype the Docket Number, Arbitration Date/Time, or fail to check the correct case type (Auto/P.I.). This typically happens due to rushing or clerical error. The consequences are significant, as the form may be rejected, misfiled, or cause serious delays in the arbitration process while staff try to locate the correct case. To avoid this, meticulously double-check all identifiers against official court notices before submission. AI-powered tools like Instafill.ai can help by flagging empty required fields and ensuring data formats for dates are correct.

The form explicitly states what to attach (e.g., 'police report,' 'expert reports,' 'hospital discharge summary') and what NOT to attach ('bills, deposition transcripts'). A frequent mistake is ignoring these instructions and either attaching everything or omitting required summaries. This can lead to the submission being deemed incomplete or frustrate the arbitrator with excessive, unrequested paperwork, reflecting poorly on the filer. Since this form is a non-fillable PDF, a tool like Instafill.ai can convert it into an interactive, fillable version, making it easier to navigate and notice these important instructions.

In sections like 'Briefly describe the accident' and 'Liability,' users often write lengthy, argumentative narratives instead of the concise summaries requested. This occurs when they attempt to argue their entire case on the form itself. The consequence is that key facts become buried, and the arbitrator may overlook the main points. A proper summary should be a few clear sentences that reference the more detailed attached reports.

The 'Economic Losses' section is highly prone to mathematical errors, especially when itemizing medical bills or calculating net wage loss. People often confuse gross vs. net wages or simply miscalculate the column totals for medical bills. These errors undermine the credibility of the damages claim and require correction later, causing delays and extra work. To prevent this, use a calculator and double-check all figures; advanced form-filling tools like Instafill.ai can be configured to perform these calculations automatically, reducing the risk of human error.

In the 'Workers’ Compensation and Other Liens' section, filers sometimes forget or intentionally omit liens from health insurers, Medicare/Medicaid, or workers' comp carriers. This is a critical error, as these entities often have a legal right to be repaid from any settlement or award. Failure to disclose can lead to serious legal complications, sanctions, and significant delays in distributing funds to the client after the case is resolved.

The form specifically asks for both 'Total Amount' and 'Unpaid Bills' for medical expenses. A common mistake is to enter the same number in both columns or to list the gross amount billed by the provider as the 'Unpaid' amount. This confusion misrepresents the actual financial impact on the litigant and can weaken the damages argument by presenting inaccurate data to the arbitrator.

When asked to 'List injuries' or 'List objective testing,' filers may write subjective complaints like 'my back hurts constantly' instead of diagnosed injuries ('L4-L5 herniation') or specific tests ('MRI of lumbar spine, 01/15/2023'). This happens when filers misunderstand the need for formal medical evidence. This weakens the claim, as arbitrators give far more weight to objective, verifiable medical findings than to subjective statements of pain.

It is surprisingly common for an attorney or pro se litigant to complete the entire two-page form but forget to sign and date the certification at the end. This simple oversight invalidates the entire submission. The form will be rejected by the clerk, requiring resubmission and potentially causing the filer to miss a critical deadline, which could have severe consequences for the case.

Despite a clear, capitalized warning on the second page, people frequently submit prohibited documents like copies of bills, full deposition transcripts, or photographs. This mistake often stems from a misguided desire to be 'extra thorough,' but it directly violates the form's instructions. This creates unnecessary administrative work and can signal to the arbitrator that the filer lacks attention to detail.

The 'Verbal Threshold' (Yes/No) checkbox is a critical element in many auto accident cases, as it determines the type of damages that can be recovered. Filers, especially those without legal representation, may not understand its significance or simply overlook it. Failing to correctly indicate whether the case is subject to the threshold can lead to fundamental misunderstandings about the case's value and legal basis from the very beginning of the arbitration process.