Yes! You can use AI to fill out Form MC 220, Recall of Warrant/Order to Apprehend and Removal From LEIN
Form MC 220 is a legal instrument used by Michigan courts to formally cancel an active warrant or order to apprehend for an individual. Its primary function is to order the return of the warrant to the court and mandate the immediate removal of the associated record from the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN), a statewide criminal justice database. This process is crucial for clearing an individual's record once the legal justification for the warrant no longer exists. Today, this form can be filled out quickly and accurately using AI-powered services like Instafill.ai, which can also convert non-fillable PDF versions into interactive fillable forms.
MC 220 is part of the
Michigan court forms category on Instafill.
Our AI automatically handles information lookup, data retrieval, formatting, and form filling.
It takes less than a minute to fill out MC 220 using our AI form filling.
Securely upload your data. Information is encrypted in transit and deleted immediately after the form is filled out.
Form specifications
| Form name: | Form MC 220, Recall of Warrant/Order to Apprehend and Removal From LEIN |
| Number of fields: | 32 |
| Number of pages: | 1 |
| Language: | English |
More forms in Michigan court forms
Instafill Demo: How to fill out PDF forms in seconds with AI
How to Fill Out MC 220 Online for Free in 2026
Are you looking to fill out a MC 220 form online quickly and accurately? Instafill.ai offers the #1 AI-powered PDF filling software of 2026, allowing you to complete your MC 220 form in just 37 seconds or less.
Follow these steps to fill out your MC 220 form online using Instafill.ai:
- 1 Navigate to Instafill.ai and upload or select the Michigan Form MC 220.
- 2 Use the AI assistant to input the court and case information, including the judicial district/circuit, case number, and police report number.
- 3 Provide the defendant's/respondent's full name, address, date of birth, and other identifying details like CTN, SID, and driver's license number.
- 4 Review the pre-filled order section, which directs the recall of the warrant and its removal from LEIN. Add an optional reason for the recall if required.
- 5 The appropriate court official (Judge, Clerk, or Register) will digitally sign and date the form to execute the order.
- 6 If applicable, complete the 'Notice of Recall' section by documenting the contact made with the relevant law enforcement agency to process the LEIN removal.
- 7 After a final review for accuracy, download, print, or electronically submit the completed Form MC 220 to the designated parties, such as the court and law enforcement agencies.
Our AI-powered system ensures each field is filled out correctly, reducing errors and saving you time.
Why Choose Instafill.ai for Your Fillable MC 220 Form?
Speed
Complete your MC 220 in as little as 37 seconds.
Up-to-Date
Always use the latest 2026 MC 220 form version.
Cost-effective
No need to hire expensive lawyers.
Accuracy
Our AI performs 10 compliance checks to ensure your form is error-free.
Security
Your personal information is protected with bank-level encryption.
Frequently Asked Questions About Form MC 220
This form is a court order used to officially cancel (recall) an active warrant or order to apprehend. It also directs law enforcement to remove the record of that warrant from the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN).
A judge, court clerk, or register completes and signs the order section of the form. Law enforcement personnel complete the 'Certificate of Removal from LEIN' section after they have removed the warrant from the system.
LEIN is the Law Enforcement Information Network, a statewide database used by police. Removing a recalled warrant is crucial to prevent an individual from being mistakenly arrested on a warrant that is no longer active.
No, this form can only be initiated and issued by the court. If you believe your warrant should be recalled, you or your attorney must address the matter with the court that issued it.
This section is for courts that do not have the direct capability to recall warrants in LEIN themselves. It documents the court's communication with the appropriate law enforcement agency, instructing them to perform the recall.
After being signed, the order is sent to the relevant law enforcement agency. The agency then removes the warrant from the LEIN system and returns the 'Certificate of Removal' to the court as proof of this action.
The form instructs law enforcement to remove the LEIN entry 'immediately' after being notified. While the exact timing can vary by agency, it is treated as an urgent matter to prevent wrongful arrests.
No, the form indicates that the 'Reason' field is optional. It can be left blank if desired.
ORI stands for 'Originating Agency Identifier,' which is a unique nine-character code assigned to a specific police department or law enforcement agency.
The certificate serves as the official record that the warrant has been cleared from the system. If it is not returned, the court may need to follow up with the law enforcement agency to confirm the removal was completed.
Yes, services like Instafill.ai use AI to auto-fill form fields accurately and save time. This can help court and legal staff quickly populate the form with the correct case and defendant information.
Simply upload the form to the Instafill.ai platform. The AI will identify all the fields, allowing you to quickly and accurately populate them with the required information before printing for signatures and distribution.
You can use a service like Instafill.ai, which can convert flat, non-fillable PDFs into interactive, fillable forms. This allows you to easily type information directly into the fields instead of printing and writing by hand.
Compliance MC 220
Validation Checks by Instafill.ai
1
Validates Case Number Format
This check ensures the 'CASE NO.' field follows the specific format required by the judicial district or circuit. Case numbers are critical for uniquely identifying a legal proceeding, and an incorrect format can lead to filing errors or failure to locate the correct record. If the format is invalid, the system should reject the submission and prompt the user to correct the entry.
2
Ensures ORI Code is Valid
The Originating Agency Identifier (ORI) must be a valid 9-character code, starting with 'MI-'. This code is essential for routing the recall notice to the correct law enforcement agency's database, particularly within the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN). An invalid ORI will cause the removal request to fail, leaving the warrant active in the system.
3
Verifies Chronological Date Consistency
This validation confirms that the dates on the form are in a logical sequence: the 'Date of offense' must be on or before the 'Issue date of warrant,' which in turn must be on or before the recall 'Order date'. This prevents illogical submissions, such as recalling a warrant before it was issued. A failure in this check indicates a data entry error that must be corrected before the form can be processed.
4
Requires Defendant/Respondent Identification
At least one primary identifier for the individual must be provided, such as the full name in 'dinfo', CTN/TCN, SID, or DOB. This is crucial to ensure the warrant for the correct person is recalled and removed from LEIN. Submitting a recall without proper identification could lead to the wrong warrant being removed or the request being rejected entirely.
5
Validates Date of Birth Plausibility
The 'DOB' field must be a valid date that has already passed and corresponds to a reasonable age for a defendant, respondent, or juvenile. The check prevents future dates or historically impossible dates (e.g., more than 120 years ago). This validation helps ensure the accuracy of the individual's record and prevents errors in the justice system database.
6
Validates Judicial Bar Number Format
The 'Bar no.' field must match the format for a Michigan State Bar number, which typically starts with a 'P' followed by a series of digits. This confirms that the order is being signed by an authorized judge or court officer with the legal authority to recall a warrant. An invalid bar number would invalidate the order itself.
7
Checks for Completeness of Notice of Recall Section
If the 'NOTICE OF RECALL' section is utilized (indicated by filling in the 'Date' field), then the 'Time', 'Name of person called/E-mail address/Fax no.', and 'Law enforcement agency' fields must also be completed. This rule ensures that if a manual notification is performed, it is documented completely for auditing and verification purposes. Incomplete documentation can create ambiguity about whether the notification was successfully sent.
8
Validates Contact Information in Notice of Recall
The 'Name of person called/E-mail address/Fax no.' field is validated to ensure the entry is a valid name, email address, or fax number. The system should check for an '@' symbol to validate as an email or a phone number pattern for a fax. This ensures the contact method recorded is legitimate and the information can be used to follow up on the notification if necessary.
9
Verifies Certificate of Removal Date Logic
The 'Date' on the 'CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL FROM LEIN' must be on or after the 'Date' the recall order was signed. A law enforcement agency cannot certify the removal of a warrant from LEIN before the court has officially ordered it. This logical check maintains the integrity of the process timeline.
10
Ensures Core Warrant Details are Present
The 'Issue date of warrant/order to apprehend' and 'Charge' fields must be filled out. These two pieces of information are fundamental to identifying the specific warrant that needs to be recalled. Without them, the law enforcement agency cannot locate the correct entry in LEIN, rendering the recall request useless.
11
Validates Court Telephone Number Format
This check ensures the 'Court telephone no.' field adheres to a standard North American phone number format (e.g., XXX-XXX-XXXX). A valid phone number is essential for law enforcement or other parties to contact the court for clarification regarding the recall order. An invalid number hinders communication and can delay the process.
12
Requires Authorization Signature Information
The 'Judge/Clerk/Register' name field must be completed to indicate who authorized the recall order. This is a critical authorization step that validates the legitimacy of the document. A missing name would render the order invalid and it would be rejected by the law enforcement agency.
Common Mistakes in Completing MC 220
Users often mistype the 'CASE NO.' or the 'ORI' (Originating Agency Identifier). Since these numbers are the primary keys for locating the warrant in court and law enforcement systems, even a single-digit error can cause the recall to fail or be applied to the wrong case. To avoid this, double-check every digit against the original warrant documents before submission.
This form includes three distinct dates: 'Issue date of warrant,' 'Date of offense,' and the order 'Date.' A frequent mistake is transposing these dates, such as entering the offense date in the warrant issue date field. This confusion can lead to record-keeping mismatches and delays in processing the recall. Always verify each date field corresponds to the correct event.
Mistakes in the defendant's personal identifiers like 'DOB' (Date of Birth), 'DLN' (Driver's License Number), or 'SID' (State Identification Number) are common and critical. Transposing numbers or entering an old address can result in the system failing to find the individual or, in a worst-case scenario, recalling a warrant for the wrong person. These fields must be filled with precision and verified against official records.
This section is conditional, which often leads to errors. Users may fail to complete it when their court requires manual notification to law enforcement, leaving the warrant active in LEIN despite the court order. Conversely, filling it out when the court has an automated process creates unnecessary work. Understanding your court's specific protocol for warrant recalls is essential to handling this section correctly.
The 'Bar no.' field next to the judge's signature is a crucial piece of information for validating the order's authenticity. This field is often overlooked or left blank, especially in a busy court environment. An order without a valid bar number may be rejected by the law enforcement agency or flagged for further verification, delaying the removal of the warrant from LEIN.
When specifying the 'Law enforcement agency' in the notice section, users sometimes enter generic terms like 'Police Department' or 'Sheriff's Office.' This is insufficient, as the notice must go to a specific agency (e.g., 'Detroit Police Department' or 'Washtenaw County Sheriff's Office'). Using the correct and complete agency name, ideally with its ORI, is vital for ensuring the recall notice is received and acted upon by the correct entity.
When this form is printed and filled out by hand, illegible handwriting can render critical information like names, case numbers, and dates unreadable. This leads to processing delays, data entry errors by the receiving agency, and potential rejection of the form. Using an AI-powered tool like Instafill.ai, which can convert a non-fillable PDF into a fillable version, ensures all entries are typed, legible, and clear.
The 'Charge' field requires the specific legal charge associated with the warrant. A common error is to use informal abbreviations, slang, or an overly simplified description of the offense. This can cause confusion and require cross-referencing, slowing down the process. The charge should be copied exactly as it appears on the original warrant to ensure accuracy.
The field for 'Defendant’s/Respondent’s/Juvenile’s name, address, and tel. no.' is often filled incompletely, with users providing only a name. While the other ID numbers are primary, having a complete address and phone number is important for cross-verification and record completeness. Leaving this information out can create ambiguity if other identifiers are also incorrect.
This form has sections for different parties, such as the court and the law enforcement agency. A court clerk might mistakenly fill out the 'CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL FROM LEIN' section, which is exclusively for the law enforcement representative to complete and return. This error disrupts the workflow and invalidates the verification process, as it breaks the chain of custody for the warrant removal confirmation.
Saved over 80 hours a year
“I was never sure if my IRS forms like W-9 were filled correctly. Now, I can complete the forms accurately without any external help.”
Kevin Martin Green
Your data stays secure with advanced protection from Instafill and our subprocessors
Robust compliance program
Transparent business model
You’re not the product. You always know where your data is and what it is processed for.
ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR
Our subprocesses adhere to multiple compliance standards, including but not limited to ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Security & privacy by design
We consider security and privacy from the initial design phase of any new service or functionality. It’s not an afterthought, it’s built-in, including support for two-factor authentication (2FA) to further protect your account.
Fill out MC 220 with Instafill.ai
Worried about filling PDFs wrong? Instafill securely fills form-mc-220-recall-of-warrantorder-to-apprehend-and-removal-from-lein forms, ensuring each field is accurate.
