Form AO 85A is a legal document used in the United States federal court system that allows parties in a case to consent to have a dispositive motion referred to a magistrate judge for decision.

What is the purpose of the Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Dispositive Motion?

The purpose of the Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Dispositive Motion is to facilitate the efficient handling of certain motions by allowing parties to agree to have a magistrate judge decide the motion, which can expedite the judicial process.

Who can consent to have a motion referred to a magistrate judge?

Any party involved in the case can consent to have a motion referred to a magistrate judge. This typically includes both plaintiffs and defendants.

What happens if a party withholds consent?

If a party withholds consent, the motion will not be referred to a magistrate judge and will instead be decided by a district judge. The case will proceed through the normal judicial process.

Will the name of a party who withholds consent be revealed to the judge?

No, the name of a party who withholds consent will not be revealed to the judge. The process is designed to protect the confidentiality of the parties' decisions regarding consent.

What types of motions can be referred to a magistrate judge?

Form AO 85A allows for the referral of various dispositive motions to a magistrate judge. These typically include motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, and other motions that may dispose of a case or a significant part of it. The specific types of motions that can be referred may vary based on local rules and the discretion of the district judge.

How do parties indicate their consent on Form AO 85A?

Parties indicate their consent on Form AO 85A by signing the form. Each party must provide their signature to confirm their agreement to have the magistrate judge handle the dispositive motion. This consent is crucial as it signifies that both parties are willing to proceed with the magistrate judge's authority in this matter.

What should be included in the list of motions on the form?

The list of motions on Form AO 85A should include all dispositive motions that the parties wish to refer to the magistrate judge. This may encompass specific motions such as motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, or any other relevant motions that could lead to a final resolution of the case. It is important to clearly identify each motion to ensure proper handling.

What is the significance of the district judge's signature on the form?

The district judge's signature on Form AO 85A is significant as it formally authorizes the referral of the dispositive motion to the magistrate judge. This signature indicates that the district judge has reviewed the consent of the parties and agrees to allow the magistrate judge to preside over the motion, thereby facilitating the judicial process.

When should Form AO 85A be returned to the clerk of court?

Form AO 85A should be returned to the clerk of court as soon as the parties have completed the form, including all necessary signatures. Timely submission is important to ensure that the referral process is initiated without delay, allowing the magistrate judge to address the dispositive motion promptly.

What does it mean for a magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings?

When a magistrate judge conducts all proceedings, it means that the judge has been authorized to oversee the entire case, including pre-trial motions, hearings, and the trial itself. This allows for a more streamlined process, as the magistrate judge can manage the case from start to finish, ensuring efficiency and consistency in rulings.

What is the legal authority under which a magistrate judge operates?

Magistrate judges operate under the authority granted by the United States Congress, specifically through Title 28 of the United States Code, Section 636. This section outlines the powers and responsibilities of magistrate judges, including their ability to conduct hearings, make recommendations, and issue orders in civil and criminal cases.

What is the role of the United States District Court in this process?

The United States District Court serves as the overarching judicial authority in cases where a magistrate judge is involved. While the magistrate judge handles specific proceedings, the District Court retains the power to review decisions made by the magistrate, approve or reject recommendations, and ultimately issue final rulings on the case.

Is there any risk of adverse consequences for withholding consent?

Yes, withholding consent for a magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings may lead to delays in the case and could potentially affect the outcome. Parties who choose not to consent may have their cases assigned to a district judge, which could result in a longer timeline for resolution and increased legal costs.

How can parties ensure their consent is properly documented?

Parties can ensure their consent is properly documented by completing and submitting the appropriate consent form, such as Form AO 85A, to the court. It is important to follow the court's instructions carefully and to keep a copy of the submitted consent for their records. Additionally, parties should confirm with the court that their consent has been received and acknowledged.

What is the effective date of the current version of Form AO 85A?

The effective date of the current version of Form AO 85A is specified in the header of the form. It is important to use the most recent version to ensure compliance with current legal standards.

Can parties change their consent after submitting the form?

Yes, parties can change their consent after submitting Form AO 85A. However, they must follow the appropriate legal procedures to formally withdraw or modify their consent.

What should parties do if they have questions about the form?

If parties have questions about Form AO 85A, they should consult with their legal counsel or contact the court for clarification. It is essential to understand the implications of the form before submission.

Are there any specific formatting requirements for the signatures on the form?

Yes, there are specific formatting requirements for signatures on Form AO 85A. Signatures should be clear and legible, and they must be accompanied by the printed names of the signatories to ensure proper identification.

What is the importance of the printed names of parties and attorneys on the form?

The printed names of parties and attorneys on Form AO 85A are crucial for identification purposes. They help to clearly establish who is consenting to the motion and ensure that all parties are properly recognized in the legal process.

Fill out Form AO 85A, Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Dispositive Motion with Instafill.ai

Worried about filling PDFs wrong? Instafill securely fills AO-85A forms, ensuring each field is accurate.

Fill out Form AO-85A

#1 AI PDF Filling Software of 2025

3 out of 4 customers say they prepare their AO 85A forms in 37 seconds or less

Secure platform for your PDF forms and personal information

Form name:	Form AO 85A, Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Dispositive Motion
Number of pages:	1
Download form:	https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/ao085a.pdf

Instafill Demo: filling out a legal form in seconds

Compliance AO 85A
Validation Checks by Instafill.ai

Verifies that the court information includes the correct name of the district court and the state.

This validation check ensures that the court information provided in the form accurately reflects the correct name of the district court and the corresponding state. It confirms that any discrepancies in the court's name or state designation are flagged for correction. By validating this information, the software helps maintain the integrity of the legal process and ensures that the motion is directed to the appropriate jurisdiction. This check is crucial for preventing potential delays or rejections due to incorrect court information.

Confirms that the case information section contains the names of the plaintiff and defendant as they appear in the case documents.

This validation check verifies that the names of the plaintiff and defendant are accurately captured in the case information section of the form. It ensures that these names match exactly as they appear in the official case documents, which is vital for legal accuracy. By confirming this information, the software helps to prevent any confusion or misidentification of the parties involved in the case. This check is essential for upholding the legal standards required in court filings.

Ensures that the civil action number is accurately entered in the designated area.

This validation check ensures that the civil action number is correctly entered in the specified area of the form. It verifies that the number matches the official case number assigned by the court, which is critical for tracking and referencing the case. By validating this information, the software helps to avoid any potential issues related to case identification and processing. This check is important for maintaining the organization and efficiency of legal proceedings.

Checks that each motion listed in the consent section is identified by its correct document number and title.

This validation check verifies that each motion included in the consent section is accurately identified by its corresponding document number and title. It ensures that there are no errors or omissions in the identification of motions, which could lead to misunderstandings or procedural complications. By checking this information, the software helps to ensure that all parties are aware of the specific motions being referred. This check is vital for the clarity and effectiveness of the consent process.

Validates that the printed names of all parties and attorneys consenting to the referral are clearly legible.

This validation check ensures that the printed names of all parties and attorneys who are consenting to the referral are clearly legible on the form. It verifies that there are no issues with handwriting or formatting that could obscure the names. By validating this information, the software helps to prevent any potential disputes regarding consent due to illegible signatures or names. This check is important for ensuring that all parties' agreements are properly documented and recognized.

Ensures that all parties and attorneys have signed the form in the designated area.

This validation check ensures that all required parties and attorneys have provided their signatures in the specified areas of the form. It verifies that no signatures are missing, which is crucial for the validity of the document. By confirming the presence of all necessary signatures, the check helps to prevent any potential disputes regarding consent. This step is essential to uphold the integrity of the legal process.

Confirms that each signature is dated appropriately to reflect the consent.

This validation check confirms that each signature on the form is accompanied by an appropriate date, reflecting when consent was given. It ensures that the dates are not only present but also accurate, which is vital for establishing a timeline of consent. By verifying the dates, the check helps to prevent any confusion or legal challenges that may arise from improperly dated signatures. This step is crucial for maintaining the legal validity of the document.

Verifies that the Reference Order section is left blank for the district judge to complete.

This validation check verifies that the Reference Order section of the form is left blank, allowing the district judge to complete it as necessary. It ensures that no unauthorized entries are made in this section, which could compromise the document's integrity. By confirming that this area is unfilled, the check helps to maintain the proper procedural flow of the legal process. This step is essential for ensuring that the form meets all judicial requirements.

Ensures that the form is not submitted directly to a judge, but rather to the clerk of court if consenting to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge.

This validation check ensures that the form is submitted to the clerk of court rather than directly to a judge when consenting to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge. It verifies that the submission process adheres to the proper legal protocols, which is crucial for the acceptance of the document. By confirming the correct submission pathway, the check helps to prevent any procedural errors that could delay the case. This step is vital for maintaining the efficiency of the court system.

Checks that the form is reviewed for overall accuracy and completeness before submission.

This validation check checks that the form has been thoroughly reviewed for overall accuracy and completeness prior to submission. It ensures that all required fields are filled out correctly and that there are no errors that could lead to complications. By verifying the completeness of the form, the check helps to minimize the risk of rejection or delays in processing. This step is essential for ensuring that the document is ready for legal proceedings.

Validates that all required signatures are present on the form.

This validation check ensures that all necessary signatures are included on the Form AO 85A. It verifies that each party who is required to sign has done so, preventing any potential delays in processing. By confirming the presence of these signatures, it helps maintain the integrity of the submission. This check is crucial for ensuring that the document is legally binding and recognized by the court.

Confirms that the form is legible and free from any smudges or unclear handwriting.

This validation check verifies that the Form AO 85A is clear and readable, ensuring that all text is legible. It checks for any smudges or unclear handwriting that could lead to misinterpretation of the information provided. By confirming the clarity of the form, it helps facilitate a smooth review process by the court. This check is essential for maintaining the professionalism and accuracy of the submitted documents.

Ensures that the consent section accurately reflects the intentions of all parties involved.

This validation check ensures that the consent section of the Form AO 85A accurately captures the intentions of all parties. It verifies that the language used is clear and unambiguous, preventing any misunderstandings regarding consent. By confirming the accuracy of this section, it helps uphold the legal standards required for such documents. This check is vital for ensuring that all parties are in agreement and that their intentions are properly documented.

Verifies that no additional information is included that could confuse the submission process.

This validation check verifies that the Form AO 85A does not contain any extraneous information that could complicate the submission. It ensures that only relevant details are included, which helps streamline the review process. By confirming the absence of unnecessary information, it aids in maintaining clarity and focus on the essential elements of the motion. This check is important for preventing potential delays or confusion during the court's evaluation.

Confirms that the form is submitted within any applicable deadlines related to the case.

This validation check confirms that the Form AO 85A is submitted within the required deadlines set forth by the court. It ensures that all timelines are adhered to, which is critical for the timely processing of the motion. By verifying compliance with these deadlines, it helps prevent any procedural issues that could arise from late submissions. This check is essential for maintaining the flow of the legal process and ensuring that all parties are treated fairly.

Common Mistakes in Completing AO 85A

Specifying the wrong court name or district can lead to significant delays in the processing of your motion. It is crucial to verify the correct court and district before submitting the form. To avoid this mistake, double-check the court's official website or consult with your attorney to ensure accuracy. This attention to detail can prevent unnecessary complications in your case.

Failing to include the names of all plaintiffs or defendants can result in the motion being deemed incomplete. It is essential to list every party involved in the case to ensure that all relevant individuals are notified. To avoid this error, review the case documents carefully and confirm that all names are accurately included. This practice not only enhances clarity but also upholds the integrity of the legal process.

The civil action number is a critical identifier for your case, and omitting it can lead to confusion and delays. Always ensure that this number is clearly stated on the form to facilitate proper tracking and processing. To prevent this mistake, cross-reference your documents to confirm the civil action number is correct and included. This small detail can significantly impact the efficiency of your legal proceedings.

Neglecting to list all motions in the consent section can create ambiguity regarding the parties' agreements and intentions. It is important to be thorough and transparent about all motions being consented to in order to avoid misunderstandings. To mitigate this risk, take the time to review all motions related to your case and ensure they are accurately reflected in the consent section. This diligence fosters clear communication and helps maintain the integrity of the legal process.

Illegible names can lead to confusion and miscommunication, potentially affecting the outcome of your motion. It is vital to ensure that all names are printed clearly and legibly to avoid any issues with identification. To prevent this mistake, consider using block letters or typing the names if possible. Clear communication is essential in legal documents, and taking this extra step can help ensure that all parties are correctly identified.

Failing to date signatures can lead to confusion regarding the timeline of the consent and reference. It is essential to ensure that all signatures are accompanied by the date they were signed. This practice not only provides clarity but also helps in maintaining a proper record of the document's execution. To avoid this mistake, always double-check that each signature is dated before submitting the form.

Submitting the form directly to a judge bypasses the proper channels and can result in delays or rejection of the motion. It is crucial to follow the established procedures for filing documents, which typically involve submitting to the court clerk or through an electronic filing system. To prevent this error, familiarize yourself with the court's filing procedures and ensure that you are submitting the form to the correct office.

Leaving the Reference Order section incomplete can lead to misunderstandings about the specifics of the motion being referenced. This section is vital for providing context and clarity regarding the request being made. To avoid this mistake, carefully review the Reference Order section and ensure that all necessary information is filled out completely and accurately before submission.

Neglecting to review the form for accuracy can result in errors that may affect the outcome of the motion. It is important to thoroughly check all entries for correctness, including names, dates, and other critical information. To mitigate this risk, take the time to review the entire form multiple times and consider having a colleague or legal professional review it as well to catch any potential mistakes.

Omitting required signatures can render the form invalid and delay the processing of the motion. Each signature is a critical component that signifies consent and agreement to the terms outlined in the document. To avoid this issue, make a checklist of all required signatures and verify that each one is present before submitting the form.

Saved over 80 hours a year

“I was never sure if my IRS forms like W-9 were filled correctly. Now, I can complete the forms accurately without any external help.”

Kevin Martin Green

Your data stays secure with advanced protection from Instafill and our subprocessors

Robust compliance program

Transparent business model

You’re not the product. You always know where your data is and what it is processed for.

ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR

Our subprocesses adhere to multiple compliance standards, including but not limited to ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR.

Security & privacy by design

We consider security and privacy from the initial design phase of any new service or functionality. It’s not an afterthought, it’s built-in, including support for two-factor authentication (2FA) to further protect your account.

Fill out AO 85A with Instafill.ai

Worried about filling PDFs wrong? Instafill securely fills ao-85a forms, ensuring each field is accurate.

Fill out Form AO-85A

Fill out Form AO 85A, Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Dispositive Motion with Instafill.ai

Instafill Demo: filling out a legal form in seconds

Compliance AO 85A Validation Checks by Instafill.ai

Common Mistakes in Completing AO 85A

Incorrect court name or district specified

Missing plaintiff or defendant names

Omitting civil action number

Failure to list all motions in consent section

Illegible printed names of parties or attorneys

Signatures not dated

Submitting form directly to a judge

Incomplete Reference Order section

Not reviewing form for accuracy before submission

Missing required signatures