Yes! You can use AI to fill out Form CR-252, Receiving Court Comment Form
Form CR-252, the Receiving Court Comment Form, is a mandatory document in the California court system as specified by Penal Code § 1203.9 and Rule of Court 4.530. It allows a court that is proposed to receive a transferred probation or mandatory supervision case to provide written comments to the original court about the appropriateness of the transfer. This ensures the transferring court considers the receiving court's perspective before making a final decision. Today, this form can be filled out quickly and accurately using AI-powered services like Instafill.ai, which can also convert non-fillable PDF versions into interactive fillable forms.
CR-252 is part of the
California court forms category on Instafill.
Our AI automatically handles information lookup, data retrieval, formatting, and form filling.
It takes less than a minute to fill out CR-252 using our AI form filling.
Securely upload your data. Information is encrypted in transit and deleted immediately after the form is filled out.
Form specifications
| Form name: | Form CR-252, Receiving Court Comment Form |
| Number of fields: | 21 |
| Number of pages: | 1 |
| Language: | English |
Instafill Demo: How to fill out PDF forms in seconds with AI
How to Fill Out CR-252 Online for Free in 2026
Are you looking to fill out a CR-252 form online quickly and accurately? Instafill.ai offers the #1 AI-powered PDF filling software of 2026, allowing you to complete your CR-252 form in just 37 seconds or less.
Follow these steps to fill out your CR-252 form online using Instafill.ai:
- 1 Navigate to Instafill.ai and upload or select Form CR-252, the Receiving Court Comment Form.
- 2 Use the AI assistant to automatically populate court and case information, such as the county, branch name, case number, and defendant's details.
- 3 Enter the date, time, and location of the scheduled hearing for the intercounty transfer motion.
- 4 Select whether the proposed transfer is for 'probation' or 'mandatory supervision'.
- 5 In the comments section, the judicial officer will state the court's position on the proposed transfer, explaining why it is or is not appropriate.
- 6 Review all entered information for accuracy, then have the judicial officer sign and date the form.
- 7 Securely download, print, or submit the completed form as required by the court, no later than 10 days before the hearing.
Our AI-powered system ensures each field is filled out correctly, reducing errors and saving you time.
Why Choose Instafill.ai for Your Fillable CR-252 Form?
Speed
Complete your CR-252 in as little as 37 seconds.
Up-to-Date
Always use the latest 2026 CR-252 form version.
Cost-effective
No need to hire expensive lawyers.
Accuracy
Our AI performs 10 compliance checks to ensure your form is error-free.
Security
Your personal information is protected with bank-level encryption.
Frequently Asked Questions About Form CR-252
This form is used by a Superior Court (the 'receiving court') to provide written comments to another court (the 'transferring court') about a proposed transfer of a defendant's probation or mandatory supervision case.
A judicial officer, such as a judge, from the proposed receiving court must complete and sign this form. It is not intended for use by the defendant, attorneys, or the general public.
This form is used after a receiving court is notified of a motion to transfer a supervision case to its jurisdiction. It allows the receiving court to formally state its opinion on the transfer before the original court makes a final decision.
Yes, any comments from the receiving court must be provided in writing to the transferring court no later than 10 days before the scheduled hearing date for the transfer motion.
The comments section is where the receiving court's judge explains why the proposed transfer is or is not appropriate. This could involve factors related to court resources, the defendant's residence, or other relevant logistical considerations.
The transferring court is required to state on the record that it has received and considered the comments from the receiving court before deciding whether to approve or deny the transfer.
No, the court rule states that a receiving court *may* provide comments, so it is optional. However, if the court chooses to comment, it should use this official CR-252 form.
In Section 1, you must provide the details of the scheduled hearing for the transfer motion, including the date, time, department, and court address, and select whether the transfer is for probation or mandatory supervision.
The completed and signed form must be sent to the transferring court, specifically to the department where the transfer motion is scheduled to be heard.
No, this is an official communication form exclusively for use between courts. The defendant and their counsel participate in the transfer hearing itself but do not fill out the CR-252.
Yes, services like Instafill.ai use AI to accurately auto-fill form fields with case information like names, case numbers, and court details, which can save time and reduce errors for court staff.
You can use a service like Instafill.ai to fill out this form online. Simply upload the form, and the tool will make the fields interactive for you to type in your information, which can then be saved or printed.
If you have a non-fillable or 'flat' PDF, you can use a tool like Instafill.ai. It can convert the non-fillable PDF into an interactive form that you can easily complete on your computer.
Compliance CR-252
Validation Checks by Instafill.ai
1
Case Number Presence and Format
This check ensures the 'CASE NUMBER' field is not empty and conforms to a standard court case number format. The case number is the primary identifier for the legal proceeding, and its absence or incorrect formatting would prevent the form from being correctly filed and associated with the proper case record. If this validation fails, the user should be prompted to enter a valid case number before submission.
2
Defendant Name Presence
Validates that the 'DEFENDANT' field contains a value. The defendant's name is critical for identifying the individual to whom the intercounty transfer applies. Submitting the form without this information would make it ambiguous and legally insufficient. A failure would require the user to input the defendant's full name.
3
Date of Birth Format and Plausibility
Ensures the 'DATE OF BIRTH' is entered in a valid date format (e.g., MM/DD/YYYY) and represents a date in the past. This is used for positive identification of the defendant. An invalid format or a future date would indicate a data entry error and could lead to misidentification. The system should reject invalid formats and dates that are not logically possible.
4
Transfer Type Selection Required
Verifies that one of the two options, 'probation' or 'mandatory supervision', has been selected in Section 1. This selection defines the legal context of the transfer motion and is a mandatory piece of information. If neither is selected, the form is incomplete and cannot be properly interpreted by the transferring court.
5
Hearing Date Validity
This check confirms that the hearing 'Date' in Section 1 is a valid date and is set for a future date. A hearing cannot be scheduled for a past date, and an invalid format would cause confusion. This validation prevents logical impossibilities and ensures the receiving court is commenting on an upcoming, scheduled event. A failure would require the user to correct the date.
6
Hearing Time Format
Validates that the hearing 'Time' in Section 1 is entered in a recognizable time format (e.g., HH:MM AM/PM). This ensures clarity for all parties regarding the scheduled hearing. An ambiguous or incorrectly formatted time could lead to missed court appearances. The system should enforce a standard time format.
7
Hearing Court County Presence
Ensures the 'Superior Court of the County of' field in Section 1 is filled out. This specifies the jurisdiction where the transfer motion will be heard, which is essential information for all parties involved. Leaving this blank would create ambiguity about the location of the hearing. A validation failure should prompt the user to specify the county.
8
Comment Field Presence
Checks that the comment text box in Section 2 is not empty. The entire purpose of this form is for the receiving court to provide comments on the proposed transfer. An empty submission would defeat the purpose of the form and may indicate the user forgot to include their remarks. If the field is empty, a warning should be displayed asking the user to confirm they intend to submit without comments.
9
Judicial Officer Name Presence
Validates that the '(JUDICIAL OFFICER)' field in the signature block is not empty. The form must be signed by a judge to be valid, as stated in the instructions. An anonymous submission would lack legal authority. This check ensures the form is properly authenticated by a named judicial officer.
10
Signature Date vs. Hearing Date Consistency
This is a critical logical check that verifies the signature 'Date' is no later than 10 days before the hearing 'Date' set in Section 1. This rule is explicitly stated in the form's instructions (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.530(e)). Submitting comments after this deadline would render them invalid. The system must flag any submission that violates this 10-day rule.
11
County Name Validation
This check validates that the 'COUNTY OF' specified at the top of the form is a valid California county. This prevents typographical errors and ensures the form is directed to a legitimate court jurisdiction within the state. A failure could involve cross-referencing the input against a predefined list of California's 58 counties.
12
ZIP Code Format
Ensures the 'CITY AND ZIP CODE' field contains a properly formatted 5-digit or 9-digit (ZIP+4) U.S. ZIP code. Correct ZIP code formatting is essential for mail delivery and accurate location identification of the court branch. An invalid format could lead to returned mail or processing delays. The validation should check for numeric characters and correct length.
Common Mistakes in Completing CR-252
A frequent error is entering information into boxes explicitly marked 'FOR COURT USE ONLY.' These areas are reserved for official stamps, dates, and notations by clerks at the transferring court. Filling them in can cause the document to be rejected or require manual correction, delaying the entire transfer process.
Users often transpose digits, omit critical prefixes/suffixes, or enter the wrong case number entirely. Since this form concerns a case from another jurisdiction, an incorrect number can lead to the comment being misfiled, ignored, or associated with the wrong case. It is crucial to double-check the case number against the original transfer notice.
The form and the corresponding court rule explicitly require comments to be signed by a judge to be valid. A judicial assistant or clerk may prepare the form but forget to secure the judge's signature before sending it. An unsigned form is invalid and will be disregarded, completely nullifying the receiving court's input on the transfer motion.
In Section 1, the user must select whether the transfer is for 'probation' or 'mandatory supervision.' Forgetting to check one of these boxes leaves the subject of the communication ambiguous. This omission forces the transferring court to seek clarification, delaying consideration of the comments and the motion itself.
Rule 4.530(e) requires comments to state *why* a transfer is or is not appropriate. A common mistake is providing a simple 'We object' or 'Transfer approved' without any legal or factual justification. Such comments fail to meet the rule's requirements and may be given little to no weight by the transferring court's judge.
Misspelling the defendant's name or entering an incorrect Date of Birth can create significant confusion. These are primary identifiers, and a mismatch could lead the transferring court to believe the comments pertain to a different case. Verifying this information against the official transfer notice is vital to ensure the form is correctly associated with the right individual.
Section 1 requires transcribing the hearing date, time, and department for the transfer motion. Errors in transcribing this information are common and can have serious consequences. An incorrect date could cause the comments to be sent after the 10-day pre-hearing deadline, making them untimely and inadmissible for consideration.
Users may enter a general courthouse address instead of the specific branch or department address where the judicial officer is located. This can cause confusion and misdirect any return correspondence from the transferring court. It is essential to use the precise address of the originating department for clarity and proper record-keeping.
Although this is a fillable PDF, users sometimes print and complete forms by hand, leading to illegible entries. Poor handwriting for critical data like the case number or the judge's comments can render the form useless, causing delays while a legible copy is requested. Using the fillable fields ensures clarity, and for non-fillable PDFs, tools like Instafill.ai can create a fillable version to prevent this issue.
This form is completed by the 'receiving' court to comment on a transfer. A common point of confusion is entering the 'transferring' court's information in the header. The header must identify the court that is providing the comments, and this mistake can cause significant administrative confusion about the document's origin and purpose.
Saved over 80 hours a year
“I was never sure if my IRS forms like W-9 were filled correctly. Now, I can complete the forms accurately without any external help.”
Kevin Martin Green
Your data stays secure with advanced protection from Instafill and our subprocessors
Robust compliance program
Transparent business model
You’re not the product. You always know where your data is and what it is processed for.
ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR
Our subprocesses adhere to multiple compliance standards, including but not limited to ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Security & privacy by design
We consider security and privacy from the initial design phase of any new service or functionality. It’s not an afterthought, it’s built-in, including support for two-factor authentication (2FA) to further protect your account.
Fill out CR-252 with Instafill.ai
Worried about filling PDFs wrong? Instafill securely fills form-cr-252-receiving-court-comment-form forms, ensuring each field is accurate.
