Yes! You can use AI to fill out Form CM-110, Case Management Statement

Users often leave critical information in the top caption blank, such as the case number, the correct court branch name, or their full contact details. A frequent error is filling out the case number on the first page but forgetting to repeat it in the header of subsequent pages, which can cause pages to be misfiled. These omissions can lead to court rejection of the filing, delays in processing, and returned mail. To avoid this, double-check that every field in the caption on page 1 is complete and that the case number and party names are correctly entered on all five pages.

Section 3, regarding the status of service on all parties, is frequently filled out incorrectly. Litigants may mistakenly check box 3a, claiming all parties have been served, when some have not. Alternatively, when using section 3b, they fail to provide the required specific names and detailed explanations for why service has not been completed. An inaccurate or incomplete service status prevents the case from moving forward, as the court cannot proceed until it confirms all parties have been properly notified.

In Section 4b, parties are required to provide a 'brief statement of the case' and, if applicable, specific details about damages. A common mistake is to provide a long, unfocused narrative instead of a concise summary, or to vaguely state 'damages to be proven at trial' without itemizing medical expenses, lost earnings, or the nature of equitable relief sought. This prevents the judge from properly assessing the case's complexity and value, potentially leading to an inefficient case management plan. Be specific and provide the exact figures and details requested in the instructions.

Section 10 is complex and a common source of errors. Attorneys may forget to check the box in 10a(1) confirming they have reviewed ADR options with their client, a mandatory step. Furthermore, in the table under 10c, parties often check boxes indicating they are 'willing to participate' but then fail to fill out the corresponding status on the right-hand side, leaving the court uncertain about what has actually been agreed upon or scheduled. To prevent this, carefully review each part of Section 10 and ensure all selections accurately reflect the current status of ADR discussions and agreements.

Parties sometimes fail to disclose companion, underlying, or related cases in Section 13, either through oversight or a misunderstanding of what constitutes a 'related' case. This is a serious error that can disrupt the court's ability to manage its docket, prevent conflicting rulings, and ensure judicial efficiency. Failure to disclose can result in sanctions or consolidation orders after the fact. Always carefully consider if any other legal matters involve the same parties, property, or core set of facts, and disclose them fully.

In Section 16b, parties are asked to describe all anticipated discovery and provide completion dates. A frequent mistake is to be overly general, with entries like 'All written discovery' and a distant, single date. This is unhelpful for the court. A proper response breaks down discovery into specific types (e.g., 'Deposition of Plaintiff,' 'Expert witness discovery') and assigns realistic, individual deadlines for each. A vague plan can result in the judge imposing a more rigid schedule that may not be favorable.

Parties often check the box in Section 19a, stating they have 'met and conferred' on all required subjects, without having had a substantive discussion as mandated by court rules. A brief email exchange is not sufficient. This can lead to an unproductive case management conference and judicial frustration. To avoid this, engage in a genuine, good-faith discussion with the opposing side about all topics listed in rule 3.724 and accurately report any agreements in section 19b.

Throughout the form, there are options to attach additional pages for longer explanations, such as in sections 4b, 8, and 13a. A common mistake is to check the box indicating an attachment will be used but then forget to physically include the document with the filing. It is also common to forget to update the 'Total number of pages attached' in Section 20. This results in an incomplete filing and requires follow-up with the court clerk to correct the record, causing delays.

An unsigned or undated form is invalid and will be rejected by the court. People often complete the entire five-page document and simply forget to sign and date the final page. If the statement is being submitted jointly, all required parties or their attorneys must sign. This oversight can cause you to miss a filing deadline, potentially leading to sanctions or a delay in your case management conference. Always perform a final check for a valid signature and date before submission.

On the first page, the filer must check whether the case is 'UNLIMITED' (over $35,000) or 'LIMITED' ($35,000 or less). Choosing the wrong category is a significant error with major procedural consequences, affecting everything from discovery limits to the availability of certain types of relief. This mistake often happens when the amount of damages is not carefully calculated before filing. This classification should match the complaint and be carefully considered, as changing it later requires a formal motion.